Skip to content
Cognitive LabBy Educator Today

Module · Domain D6

Metacognition and self-regulated learning

Students who plan, monitor and evaluate their learning tend to learn more — but these habits have to be modelled and taught inside subject content, then gradually handed over.

Available · draftVersion 0.1 draft11 labelled claims8 sourcesNot yet expert-reviewed

Stage 1 · Diagnose

Diagnose · before you read

What do you currently think?

Respond to each statement honestly. This is not scored or saved — it surfaces assumptions the explanation below will test.

0 of 6 answered

  1. Metacognition is just another word for executive function.
  2. Study-skills lessons taught separately from subjects are the most effective way to build metacognition.
  3. Teaching students when and why to use a strategy matters, not only how.
  4. Brain-training games improve students’ executive functions and therefore their grades.
  5. Adding a metacognitive prompt to a task will improve learning.
  6. Younger children are too young to be taught to plan and monitor their learning.

Stage 2 · Explain

Thinking about one's own learning

Metacognition is knowledge about how one learns — of oneself, of tasks, and of strategies — and the regulation of that learning: planning an approach, monitoring whether it is working, and evaluating the result. Self-regulated learning (SRL) is the broader picture, which also includes motivation and managing effort and time. (Zimmerman, 2002; Education Endowment Foundation, 2025)

Related to executive functions, but not the same

Executive functions — working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility — are general capacities for controlling thought and action. (Diamond, 2013) Metacognition uses those capacities, but it is task-specific knowledge and decisions: knowing that a perimeter problem needs a sketch, noticing a check has failed, choosing to switch strategy. Measures of the two overlap, so it is easy to conflate them.

A cycle of phases

Zimmerman describes self-regulation as recurring phases: forethought (analysing the task, setting goals, planning), performance (using strategies, monitoring), and self-reflection (evaluating, attributing, adapting), which feeds the next forethought. (Zimmerman, 2002) It is a theoretical framework, not a literal sequence that learners follow step by step.

What the research shows

Meta-analyses of classroom SRL interventions report positive average effects on achievement in primary and secondary school, with larger effects when strategy instruction is combined with metacognitive reflection. (Dignath & Büttner, 2008; Donker et al., 2014) Effects are substantially smaller on tests not designed by the researchers, and they vary widely between studies.

Explicit teaching, not just prompting

Guidance from the Education Endowment Foundation recommends explicitly teaching strategies for planning, monitoring and evaluating, modelling one's own thinking, setting an appropriate level of challenge, promoting metacognitive talk, and teaching pupils to organise and manage their own learning — supported by teachers' professional understanding and school-level development. Its seven-step model moves from modelling and guided practice towards independent practice as support is withdrawn. (Education Endowment Foundation, 2025) Students with little prior knowledge have little to plan or monitor with, so models and worked examples usually come before open prompts. (Renkl & Atkinson, 2003; Kirschner et al., 2006)